Wackjob Alert: “This Fetus Is A Parasite, A Tick”
Okay, make that double wack job alert. Have radical feminists actually grown this desperate just to be heard?
Last month, feminist blogger Biting Beaver wrote about a nightmarish experience she’d had with a broken condom and a callous medical system that refused to give her emergency contraception over the counter or by prescription.
Instead of getting medical care during the critical 72-hour window of opportunity, BB was stalled, humiliated, scorned, quizzed, and deceived. A nurse tried to tell her that EC was "the abortion pill" other healthcare providers grilled her about her sexual history and her marital status. Her pharmacy wouldn’t sell it to her OTC, her doctor wouldn’t call in a prescription, and the local emergency rooms wouldn’t give her a ‘scrip because she wasn’t raped or married.
Pat yourself on the back, culture of life, Biting Beaver is pregnant and she’s getting death threats.
Apparently so. And she even manages an abortion bleg. Not that I’m necessarily buying all this. But one way or another, it seems to me a reasonable idea that dysfunctional idiots like this be encouraged to not breed in the first place. There’s simply no room at the zoo.
As I posted this morning the EC failed and I’m currently taking other steps while I gather the money I need to finish this thing once and for all.
Every time I think about it I refer to this fetus as a ‘parasite’, a ‘tick’ and other things I won’t even mention.
I resent this fetus. I resent the fuck out of the fact that something which is 1/16 of an inch long and which looks amazingly like a reptile trumps the life of a woman and her three children. I resent that this glob of cells which is smaller than a wad of snot is clearly valued more than the life of a 34 year old woman who is trying like hell to support her existing kids.


I personally have a lot of sympathy for Biting Beaver. The ordeal she was put through was unjust. And now she is being harassed by people who claim to be pro-life (but in fact are advocates of rape and murder, as seen in the threats they sent her).
Her depiction is harsh, but I think the mockery of her should be directed at those who have wronged her.
I’m sorry for any woman who cannot get help, but I don’t have much sympathy hearing about it in such terms from someone who refers to herself as BITING BEAVER. Give me a break…..
Her depiction is harsh, but I think the mockery of her should be directed at those who have wronged her.
That would be her and whomever she let between her legs to knock her up. What BS – if she needed to have a bleg to raise money, fine. Or she could simply go off to planned parentyhood and have it taken care of. Instead she’s trying to score a political point. That type of manipulative crap with such a serious issue is unworthy of much respect.
“I’m sorry for any woman who cannot get help, but I don’t have much sympathy hearing about it in such terms from someone who refers to herself as BITING BEAVER.”
I just thought of the mammal known as the beaver when I read her blog. My mind didn’t go there.
Oh, come on. No one would give her “emergency contraception”? I don’t buy it. I know JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL girls who have no problem getting it, sometimes every frickin’ weekend! I don’t buy her story, it sounds too contrived to me.
The Liberal View Of A Child In The Womb: Baby Or Tick?
Last week, Kos wrote this in a short diary entry: “My wife and I just got back from the 12-week…
Feminist Blogger Calls Fetus Parasite; Publicly Announces Intent to Kill
Sisters are doing it for themselves! – Aretha Franklin
You know me. I dont get in the middle of bloggers junk, but I think you should be aware of this.
It is human nature to want pleasure without responsibility and to expect our action…
In some areas in this country it is difficult to obtain either the medication or the abortion (abortion cliniques are disappearing). Whether you like this girl or not, as long as it is still ‘legal’ she should have been helped.
I don’t understand why it is so difficult to understand for someone who has three kids already. Unless she was having sex with a Pro-lifer—we aren’t to blame. Abstinence is still the best contraceptive—-and 100% foolproof(wink). And I happen to know from personal experience, when you have a baby they only ask you a hundred times if you want a tubal, and what your plan is for contraception.
What total Bullshit. If you read the post from “biting beaver” you’ll see that SHE REFUSED TO GO TO THE ER. She didn’t want to be “shamed” by giving a history. Her doctor told her to go to the ER, she refused to go. I halfway wonder if the Doc wasn’t up and out of bed waiting for hours for her to show up and BB stood her up.
Even if the hospital would have balked, BB’s Doc could have called in the authorizaion for treatment, simple, done, over.
This is dramatic political fiction, or an admission of her own irresponsibility (by not going to the ER). It also feels like another of those “I have a right not to be offended or insulted” rants we hear from libs, which is also bullshit.
–Jason
Sorry, but Biting Beaver made her choice when she decided to have sex. If you don’t want the child, don’t spread your legs. I know that’s something folks might not want to hear because they enjoy sex, but that’s the truth.
Along with sex, I enjoy eating pizza, but I also know that it will make me fat. Damn that anti-skinny choice conspiracy!
Abortion
Here’s an item from [Real World View] that just yanks at the old heart strings…there are other liberal, feminist bloggers bemoaning her fate and asking for donations through PayPal. Last month, feminist blogger Biting Beaver wrote about a…
Get a rope. We must punish this woman for opening her legs.
Why do republicans hate sex.
If you don’t want to die in a car crash, don’t get in the car.
If you don’t want to get mugged, don’t walk on the street.
If you don’t want to have a baby, don’t spread your legs.
Does it work the same for men? If you don’t want to have a baby and be saddled with child support for 18 years, keep it in your pants?
Giving birth as forced punishment for sex, for women only, is my most favorite of the conservative’s mantra.
“Giving birth as forced punishment for sex, for women only,…”
xxx – Why do you ALWAYS turn everything into such political bullshit. The above statement is correct. Then you turn it into such utter horseshit, it’s no wonder people blow you off.
“..conservative’s mantra…” My ass. … oh… more to your standing – “My beaver.” <—- That liberal enough for you?
Well, let’s see here, conservatives are against abortion, they are against sex education outside of abstinance only, they are against emergency contraception unless you can PROVE you are a rape victim, they are even against condoms since our very own government since Bushy took office was taken to task for putting out wrong information that hyped the failure rate of condoms….matter of fact, conservatives are against sex outside of marriage, its a sin don’t you know and “god” does not approve of it.
If that aint an anti sex, anti woman, birth as punishment agenda then, well, I can’t imagine what it IS.
Right to kill a tick
That is not correct. You do deserve to live. Your baby just deserves to live also.
xxx,
Nice to know you see human life as a punishment. Conservatives see it as…oh, I don’t know…a human life.
Tell you what – I’ll give you a pass on the whole “woman can always decide to have an abortion over the father’s objections” thing if the man can then absolve himself of the need to pay child support payments if the woman decides to keep the baby he doesn’t want.
Or does that change the dynamic of the equation?
is abstinence what the religion preaches ? It may be me but I don;t see the difference in using a condom or birth control and abstinence.
We don’t live in a world with pink glasses, people have sex…
all sorts of things can happen (the abstincence thing doesn’t work, the condom broke whatever) but eej because some one had sex it doesn’t matter? giving birth to children shouldnt be take so lightly, it is a huge commitment, and I rather have that done by people who understand that and act accordingly.
Its a BABY
Just checked out La Shawn Barbers post about a liberal feminista blogger who referred to her unborn child, who she is going to abort, a parasite and a tick.
In my conversations with feministas like the one mentioned i…
xxx –
What a perfect name as your words are total pornography to the process of thought. You don’t score a single point for generalizing as you did. Once again you lumped human beings into political camps.
My god, you are such a moron it is stunning that you have the balls to attempt to express yourself.
Still very little comment on the fact that BB has been getting threatening emails.
Please,pro-life people. Tell me how threatening to kill a pregnant woman is “pro-life”. I honestly think that the two notions contradict each other.
“Biting Beaver” is getting threatening emails because she is a disgusting example of human flesh. The perfect *victim* that brings out the worst in all – pro-life or pro-choice.
Generalizing?
WTF? I am simply restating obvious facts of the conservative mantra, period.
As far as a father’s objection, if he can prove he told his partner he wanted no children and his partner was irresponsible…didn’t use contraceptives when she said she was using them then the father should be absolved of any parental responsibility.
This woman REFUSED TO GO TO THE LOCATION WHERE SHE COULD GET THE DRUG she wanted. She states herself that she refused to go to the drug, did she expect it to come to her????
She REFUSED TO GO TO THE LOCATION HER DOCTOR TOLD HER TO GO, the place that had the drug and would have given it to her on her doctor’s order.
She REFUSED TO GO TO THE LOCATION WHERE SHE COULD RECEIVE THE DRUG!!!! She admits this and ten cries foul. It’s BULLSHIT.
She was not DENIED anything, she refused to go to the location where it was available.
SHE ADMITS THIS BY HER OWN HAND before she launches into her BS about parasitic ticks.
–Jason
Jason, you dolt, she didn’t go to the ER because all the ER’s she called told her no one would give her a prescription for EC. Her doctor REFUSED to write the prescription for her. Read slower it might help your comprehension.
Of course the idea that you would have to go to the EMERGENCY ROOM to get a fucking high dose of birth control pills in order to avert an unwanted pregnancy is totally insane when it should be (a) available over the counter, (b) any decent doctor should be willing to write a prescription for it and (c) any decent pharmacy/pharmacist should be willing to stock and fill it.
Bullshit, she says quite clearly she didn’t go because she didn’t want to be “interviewed” to see if she meets the “criteria”. The reality of that is she didn’t want to get her medical history taken and have a real pregnancy test done to see if she qualified for the scrip. SHE IS THE ONLY PERSON WHO REFUSED ANYTHING IN THIS WHOLE SCENARIO. Doctors do not interrupt their weekend to come in, open their office and do a pregnancy test, they refer you to a facility already open with the ability to conduct the test and administer the drug.
So I’ll challenge you, call an emergency room, any emergency room in the country, tell them you want them to prescribe a prescription drug for you over the phone, see if they do it. THEY WON’T! They will tell you to come down and give a history, be examined and if conditions warrant it, then they’ll give you the medication you need and either refer you to your physician or the hospital clinic or give you the drug right there.
This woman didn’t go because she didn’t WANT to go, she didn’t want to be “interviewed”, well here’s a clue, if you want a prescription drug, then you ARE going to be interviewed, and in this case tested, to see if you meet the criteria for the drug. That’s the LAW.
She wasn’t denied anything, SHE REFUSED TO GO WHERE THE DRUG COULD BE GIVEN TO HER.
Her doctor did NOT refuse to write the scrip, the doc REFERRED her to the Emergency room because that’s where she could get the drug and the doctor’s office was closed for the weekend.
I did read the original BULLSHIT post, I read it more than three times because it was so ludicrously incredible.
She says by her own hand that the doc told her to GO TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM, she didn’t do that, instead she called around and found out that they wanted to “interview” her. Guess what, that’s par for the course for any medical treatment, it’s called “taking a history”.
NO ONE, I REPEAT, NO ONE, not one solitary person, REFUSED to write this woman a scrip. Her doctor referred her to the Emergency Room, because the emergency room had the drug. The emergency room wants a history because that’s REQUIRED for the writing of a scrip.
The “denial” she claims is bullshit. I don’t care what you think the law should be, that isn’t the issue here, it’s not the issue at all. The issue is that this woman is FULL OF SHIT. There was NO DENIAL, this woman simply failed to follow what were very very very simple instructions: GO TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM TO RECEIVE EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTION.
I’d really love to know if you can get an ER anywhere in this nation to write you a scrip over the phone. Please, please, please, try it and report back on your results. If you can prove that you can get a scrip written for you over the phone from any ER in the nation I’ll take my hat off to you. Fact is though, YOU CAN’T.
This whole story is either a COMPLETE FABRICATION, or the product of the stupidest woman in the world acting even more stupid by not listening to her doctor.
–Jason
this is EXACTLY the type of person who makes practicing medicine the daily nightmare it has become. You can’t go one day (or night if you actually own your own practice) w/o a narcissistic navel-gazer who fervently believe he/she is god’s GIFT calling & insisting they need whatever. And can’t be bothered with coming in or going to referral. Silly witch could’ve gone to urgent care – precisely the venue for this type of thing (nonemergency except in her world of I want & right now) but she would’ve had to PAY for the service & clearly she is of the priveleged ones who can’t be bothered to play “by the rules”. It’s always these types who will sue the pants off an MD who is conned into calling in a scrip & they develop an adverse outcome. Then it’s no favor – it’s the MD’s FAULT. You’d think since she is sooo up on what she needed she’d know the regimen involves regular oral contraceptives, albeit dosed somewhat differently than standard OCs (thought I’d give up for free, dincha?. Personally I am all for her termination. The interesting book Freakonomics notes the correlation between the decrease in violent crime in US starting around 15 years after Roe vs. Wade was passed & there really is sooo little opportunity for evolution to take its course anymore. Who would want 4 more sets of her gene pool out & about anyway? God, let’s set up a spay bleg for her so she can run the streets with impunity & lock up with whatever she pleased! LOL
Taking a pregnancy test is not part of the standard prep work for getting emergency contraception, there was no legitimate reason why her own doctor didn’t call in the prescription for her over the phone over the weekend.
There is no “qualifying” for the prescription, it simply doesn’t work if you are not pregnant…that is not the “law” at all, it is the ‘practice’ at Catholic Hospitals to only give EC to women who are not pregnant and NOT OVULATING..just in case the egg is fertilized but hasn’t attached yet, god forbid they pay more attention to the needs of a living breathing human being than two cells that could fit on the head of a pin.
YOu can spin what her doctor did anyway you want to, but the doctor refused to call in the prescription, which would have been easy and painless for the patient. That’s the law.
The fact is right there in her own hand. The doctor refused nothing other than to bring their weekend to a halt.
BB called the doc and was referred to the ER, SHE refused to go to the ER, it’s open and shut, by her OWN STATEMENTS.
The only REFUSAL, was her own.
Please, Please, Please, find me ONE, Emergency Room in this country which will prescribe EC over the phone. All you have to do is find one. Tell me the name of just one Hospital ER that will prescribe anything OVER THE PHONE.
She admits in plain language that SHE DID NOT GO! SHE DID NOT WANT TO BE “INTERVIEWED”. The only, and I repeat ONLY refusal was hers.
I’m not spinning anything. Those are her words, her story which say she is the only one who refused anything. A referral is not a denial, and ER’s don’t prescribe meds over the phone.
Your BS about Catholic hospitals is the only attempt at spin here. Her bogus story with it’s multiple inconsistencies and bullshit is spin over there.
She’s too stupid to cover her bases and actually get a real denial of service. So she’s manufactured one.
I challenge you again to find “the law” which states that doctors are supposed to prescribe medication over the phone without consulting with the patient in real and valid way. Please find me “the law” of which you speak.
–Jason
I don’t need “the law” dumbass because my own doctor will do it, just like most doctors would prescribe certain things over the phone to long time patients especially things like EC that don’t have any serious side effects.
MY BS about Catholic Hospitals is not BS but the standard practice, period. Look it up. That is for those few Catholic hospitals that even stock EC and are willing to give it out to rape victims only. They force the woman to take a pregnancy test and test her for where she is in her cycle, end of discussion its a fact not any kind of spin that you want to make it.
The point you are missing is that it is ridiculous to have to go to the ER for something that has been approved for OVER THE COUNTER SALES TO ADULTS BY THE FDA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The point you are missing is that she DID CALL SEVERAL ERS and nobody had EC or she was told no doctors would give it to her.
She should never have had to go to the ER in the first place for emergency contraception but should have been given a script by her own doctor.
The point you are obscuring is it is just this kind of run around that the “pro life” anti woman, anti sex forces use to force women into having children they don’t want. They can’t get contraceptives or emergency contraceptives without a moral grilling, doctors, hospitals and pharmacies can refuse to fill or stock same at their own moral discretion and the woman has nowhere to turn if she happens to live outside of the West or East Coasts where there are laws in place to protect women from such moralizing by health care providers. It is exactly the same thing all the waiting periods, disclaimers, risk statements and now fetal sonagram mandates are designed to do….deter women from getting abortions.
It is medical malpractice for a doctor to prescribe drugs to a patient without a ‘physical relationship’. It is also medical malpractice for an ER to prescribe drugs without a patient history. THAT is the FIRST thing an ER does….takes a medical history.
I was married to a doctor for twenty years. Before his practice switched to an emergency clinic for off-hour emergencies, he was guaranteed to get a call around 11 P.M. every other night when he was on-call. Stupid people wait until bedtime after watching illness develop during the day, and think…. ooh, we better call the doctor in case something happens in the night. Assholes. Total assholes.
How anyone would be a doctor these days, or president…. it’s beyond my comprehension. We refuse to let our kids go into medicine.
OMG, it was HER OWN DOCTOR, who already had her MEDICAL HISTORY, who already had a relationship with her. There are NO KNOWN serious side effects for EC beyond cramps, NO ONE has ever died or had to be hospitalized for taking EC.
These arguments that her doctor refused to call in a prescription for a drug that works in a 72 hour window were grounded in either law or proper medical practice are ludicrous.
Of course no ER is going to give some stranger a prescription without taking a history which is exactly why she should never have had to go to the ER in the FIRST PLACE. However, her marital status is NOT PART OF HER MEDICAL HISTORY and should never have been asked by any nurse as it is totally irrelevant to the issue of needing emergency contraceptives or of having any kind of health issue that would preclude being given them, which there aren’t any anyway.
Ditch the doctor. Clearly, he is totally at fault. Boo-fuckin’-hoo…….. another victim…. So tragic.
You might feel differently if due to your doctor’s either ignorance or moralizing you ended up faced with having to have an abortion instead of having gotten emergency contraceptives within the proper time frame and having prevented the unwanted pregnancy in the first place.
Contrary to conservative dogma, most women don’t take getting an abortion lightly and would MUCH prefer to prevent their pregnancy than have an abortion.
How droll you are. You assume I would put up with an ignorant doctor. You assume I would put up with a doctor who moralizes. You assume I would put up with a pharmacist who moralizes. You assume I have a reluctance to doing the right thing for myself.
God, you are such an asshole.
So lemme get this straight. You claim “it’s the law” but when asked “which law” you say the law doesn’t matter.
The drug is not available over the counter until next year. That’s unfortunate, but it’s the law.
You also want to claim that her doctor “denied” her, when she quite clearly states that her doctor told her to go to the ER, where the drug was available and where it could be given out.
I’m not obscuring anything, I’m pointing out BY THIS WOMAN’S OWN WORDS, that she refused to go to the ER. I’m not the one claiming “it’s the law” and then backtracking. I’ve been quite consistent that this woman simply refused to follow the instructions of her doctor, which was TO GO TO THE ER. She failed to do that, instead she called the ER, which DID NOT (again by her own words) say they would not give her the drug, the ER merely said (again by her own words) that she would have to PHYSICALLY COME TO THE ER and give a history, which SHE, refused to do.
You can bitch and moan all you want, but anyone who reads this can read her story. She is the only one in this whole scenario who REFUSED to do anything. NO ONE refused to do anything for her, they simply told her to come in and do what every other American has to do. She didn’t want to do that, she didn’t want to be “interviewed”, she didn’t want to give a medical history.
She’s the only one who refused. The only one who denied anything was Biting Beaver, who DENIED herself the EC by refusing to go to the ER.
I’ll still challenge you to find me ONE, just one, just one little ER anywhere which will write a scrip over the phone. Please find me just one, and I’ll leave this little discussion which you seem so involved in. Are you BB defending your post? If so, then just say so. If you are not, then back up what you are alledging and give me ONE, just one, ER which will write you a scrip over the phone without you seeing a doctor.
BB refused to go see a doctor for prescription medication. She feels she should have been given prescription medication over the phone. Well I’m sorry, but doctors don’t do that if they want to keep their liscense.
You can keep changing the subject, I’m not, but you feel free. The only person who refused to anything was Biting Beaver. No one else refused her anything, and any rational person who reads her post can see that. She says it, by her own hand and in her own words, that she was not willing to give a medical history to the ER, so she didn’t go.
The only REFUSAL was Biting Beavers, no one else was given an opportunity to even refuse her. You can bitch about her doctor, but even her doctor didn’t REFUSE her the drug, her doctor only told her to go to the ER, where the drug WAS, and where she could GET IT. But she, biting beaver, did not want to go to the ER, she refused to go, now she wants to blame everyone else, when the ONLY fault lies with her.
Once again, if you have some evidence of this “law” you cited, please tell us. If you know of an ER which will write scrips over the phone, please tell us.
Until then, you’re the only one spinning. I’ve been consistent throughout this. You have not. So you keep spinning and I’ll keep pointing out that BB admitted by her own hand that the only person who REFUSED anything, was BB herself.
But please, please, cite this “law” and please tell us the ER that will write scrips over the phone. Please. I’m begging you to just back up ONE thing, just one. Two if you feel so inclined.
I’ll back up my statements, they are in BB’s post.
–Jason
BB’s doctor REFUSED to call in a prescription, if you’ve read her post over and over as you say, then you surely have figured that out by now. It is LEGAL for her doctor to call in a prescription for her for EC without giving her a physical exam, as it is LEGAL for anyone’s doctor to call in virtually any prescription for any patient at their sole discretion.
BB called several ER’s and NONE of them said they would give her EC, not over the phone but AT ALL, e.g. our doctors wont’ prescribe it. The one place where BB might have gotten the prescription she was told the one doctor who might give it to her was going off shift.
You may think the idea of a woman spending all day and night sitting in several ER’s on the lame hope of getting EC when the night nurses ha ve already told her she won’t get it as her ‘duty’ as a good patient, but I don’t.
If the ER nurses told her she wouldn’t get it if she came in, then why should she have gone to the ER? Just for the humiliation factor?
You’re simply projecting xxx. BB does NOT say that her doctor “refused to prescribe” she states quite clearly that her doctor told her straight up, “GO TO THE ER.”
It’s also quite clear that the ER did not REFUSE either. The ER quite clearly stated that she would have to come to the ER and get “interviewed”.
You’re projecting what you WANT to read on what she actually said. The ER did not REFUSE anything because they never had the opportunity to refuse because she would not go in to the ER. It’s as simply as that.
You WANT it to be that she was refused. It fits your desire for outrage that she was refused. When the FACT is (admitted by her own hand) that SHE REFUSED to follow her doctors instructions, SHE REFUSED to got to the ER, SHE REFUSED to be “interviewed.”
So you can keep trying to project more information into this than there is, but you are wrong for doing so. You tried taking about 6 different approaches here, and you lied, mischaracterized, spun, misdirected and now you’re off on some tangent about how she should not have had to wait a few hours in an ER to get to be seen.
You still seem to think she should be able to have skipped to the front of the line, made her doctor come in off her weekend, or been prescribed medication over the phone.
GET REAL. Biting Beaver is merely trying to duck ALL RESPONSIBILITY, and you’re enabling. If she’d have gone to the ER, she’d have got the drug. That much is quite clear from the doctor’s statement. SHE REFUSED xxx, no one else refused her anything. You’re projecting, she’s either telling us a big fat series of lies or she’s delusional.
No one REFUSED her anything and you damn well know it, that’s why you have to keep changing your story and reasons for your outrage.
I still challenge you to find that “law” you screamed about and further to find an ER that will prescribe drugs over the phone.
I’m done with you because you’re out of touch with reality. Any future visitor who may stop by this thread can go read for themselves where she quite clearly states that the decision NOT TO GO TO THE ER was hers and hers alone, solely because she didn’t want to give a medical history.
Biting Beaver is beyond ridiculous and I don’t even have to bash her on her comments, just simply look at what she admitted. You’re even more ridiculous for trying to defend both her comments and her irresponsibility and for manufacturing “laws” for her.
Have a nice day in your delusions xxx.
–Jason
1. The doctor told her to go to the EC INSTEAD OF CALLING IN A PRESCRIPTION, this is a refusal to write the prescription whether it was made obvious to the patient or not since it was well within the doctor’s discretion to call in the script.
2. All of the EC’s that B called told her she ‘might’ be able to ‘talk the doctor into writing the script’ if she met his “criteria” since there is ZERO MEDICAL CRITERIA for getting emergency contraception and B was repeatedly asked about ‘trauma’ and her marital status only a moron would not be able to determine that it was a moral not a medical critera the nurses were referring to. Not to mention the many EC’s that simply said she COULD NOT GET IT because they DID NOT PRESCRIBE IT, especially the nurse who said that emergency contraception and the abortion pill were ‘the same’
I NEVER said any ER would or should prescribe medicine over the phone, peirod.
It is clear by the questions that B was asked and the references to old fashioned doctors and ‘criteria’ that they were not simply refering to the taking of a medical history as the criteria for getting EC or they would not have repeatedly told her she ‘might’ be able to ‘convince’ the doc to give her a script for it.
She did not go to the ER because the nurses made it clear to her that she was not going to get EC unless she was able to ‘convince’ the doctor to give it to her or unless she met the doctors ‘criteria’…and since I will say AGAIN there is no medical criteria related to getting EC…there was no reason for B to submit herself to needless humiliation by having to beg some ‘old fashioned’ ER doc to give her emergency contraceptives.
1. Pregnancy test IS std of care before prescribing emergency contraception.
2. Determining contraindications to therapy – eg, smoker over 35, history of thromboembolic disease – personal or familial, etc – IS standard of care.
3. Giving risks/benefits of therapy IS std of care.
4. The aforementioned CAN NOT be performed over the phone (for free, afterall it’s just a prescription that doctor owes me right?)
5. Everyone knows condoms alone hav a 32% + failure rate/ 100 women years. She, the well-informed multiparous, who knows so well what others (who wouldn’t willingly touch her with a 10 foot pole)OWE her should’ve taken more care. For goodness sake, after 3 anklebiters already born, don’t you think she’d realize she’s using up more than her fair share of the “carbon-footprint”? Oh, my bad, the wee bairn of this broad actually METABOLIZE carbon dioxide & we are LUCKY to breathe their emissions!!! ROFLMAO except that this overentitled witch actually BELIEVES someone (other than the one humoing her) has wronged her! Yes, these women are running the streets – gotta wonder what hooked up with her, eh?
BULLSHIT.
THAT IS TOTAL BULLSHIT.
If a pregnancy test was needed before getting EC it wouldn’t be going over the counter.
If a medical history was needed before getting EC it wouldn’t be going over the counter either.
No pregnancy test is needed because it does not end a pregnancy. The only whack jobs that demand a pregnancy test be given before getting EC is Catholic Hospitals which also test for where the woman is in her ovulating cycle and if she is ovulating they WONT GIVE IT TO HER.
Stop spreading absolute lies.
A pregnancy test IS NOT STANDARD PROCEDURE for getting EC.
open your own practice with your medical license, THEN you will actually know something. The crux of the debate about over-the-counter oral contraceptives, including emergency hormonal contraception, centers on idiots who will not bother to read warnings, indications & contraindications, ultimately resulting in thromboembolic events, unintended pregnancies & other complications which a silly twat like xxx can’t currently be bothered with. The benefit of OTC availability would be to keep these “who know more than everyone” away from medical professionals for the most part & totally place the onace for their behavior on them. I like that. I don’t want to assume responsibility for these hard headed witches who are quick to blame others for the outcomes of their impulsive behaviors. Have at it ye who knows all without benefit of education!
Anyone who reads the post by BB knows that you’re flat out telling lies xxx. You keep alluding to “laws” that aren’t real, you keep referring to practices that aren’t real, and you keep referring to statements that BB did not make. PERIOD.
There was no refusal, there were some occasions where HER doctor did not act the way SHE THOUGHT they should, but that’s immaterial. The doctor referred her to the ER, she did not go. Had she gone, she’d have gotten what she wanted, simply based on her doctors order, ER’s don’t fill scrips xxx, they dispense with the treatment right there. She didn’t go, no treatment.
You keep seeming to think that you should be able to call your doc and get a scrip. Well, that’s not the way things are supposed to work, and you damn well know it.
You’ve failed to address anything, with every challenge you simply offer a whole new set of “offensives” that you are making up as you go.
The only thing that amounts to a REFUSAL in BB’s post is HER OWN REFUSAL to go to the ER when she admits she was expressly told to go. Her conversations over the phone are immaterial to this point, they have no bearing on it.
You’re also either projecting or willfully making up your assertion that the ER’s told her over the phone that they would not provide it to her, they simply told her that they would need a history and have to evaluate her. That’s what doctors are supposed to do.
So I’ll ask you right now, xxx, are you a doctor? Or are you just making things up as you go along. Actually scratch that, because anyone who can read BB’s post can see that you are both.
The ONLY refusal was hers, which she admits by her own hand. You can offer whatever make-believe scenarios you want, but the fact remains, the only actual refusal was hers in not going to the ER. The facts are facts and they are written down by BB herself. You can keep trying to correct the errors in her post if you want, but you’re not being truthful or logical in doing so.
So rant on about the Catholics, laws that aren’t laws and keep making things up as you go along, but her statements are there for everyone to see, and anyone who bothers to take a look can see that the ONLY REFUSAL WAS HERS.
You’ve got her own post working against your make-believe points and “law”. The greatest flaw in your argument, is BB’s post xxx. Sorry, but you’ve been sabotaged by the very person you’re trying to defend. She admits by her own hand, the only refusal were creations of her own mind (therefore false) and HER REFUSAL to follow instructions and go to the ER.
She’s blatently lying about the whole thing anyway, but thanks for playing xxx, you’ve done a great service to our side of the debate by showing how intellectually dishonest about the issue your side is.
–Jason
Have you ever read any of the other shit that this chick rants about? She is convinced that one of her sons is going to grow up to be a rapist because he wants to look at pornography. She says that she would have had an abortion if she knew this back then.
Ironically, all three of her children are boys. This is probably divine punishment for being such a batshit crazy feminazi.
I don’t support either side of the abortion issue. I’m a guy, my opinion doesn’t matter on this subject. I think only women should have a say in this matter. But this chick is nuts. Where the hell is Child Services? Her sons are in danger. I wouldn’t be surprised if she had them castrated.
I wonder if her mother thought of her as a parasite?