MoveOn.Org: The Nefarious Name That Shall Not Be Named

By
October 11, 2007

Update: More background at Snappedshot – Google may have a defense.

Well, this is bizarre – you can’t run a negative ad regarding MoveOn.Org on Google because you can’t use their name, according to Google? What a crock. Lance Dutson posts a complete chat text with Google over the issue at link above and Robert Cox addresses it here at The Examiner.

Don’t look for too many liberals, allegedly concerned with free speech, to have an opinion on this issue. They don’t support freedom unless it involves forwarding their destructive political agenda.



AdSense 300×250
NewsMax Trending Now
Comments:
  1. snapped shot says:

    The Moving Target that is Move On

    Michelle Malkin has raised the Evil Google! alarm again over some advertisements which were rejected by the AdSense/AdWords department for “trademark” infringement.
    Now, I’m not a lawyer, and I don’t play one on television, but I don’t think that Googl

  2. Larry Sheldon says:

    There certainly is a principle here, but the LL won’t see it.
    But as a practical matter there are lots of ways of blocking ALL ads on Google which I have been doing for some time because of the offensiveness of so many “on-line” adds (seizure-inducing jigglies being the primary targets).

  3. snapped shot says:

    The Moving Target that is Move On

    Michelle Malkin has raised the Evil Google! alarm again over some advertisements which were rejected by the AdSense/AdWords department for “trademark” infringement.
    Now, I’m not a lawyer, and I don’t play one on television, but I don’t think that Googl

  4. Google Denies Republican Ads That Counter MoveOn’s Message

    George Soros and company up to their tricks once again. This time they ban some internet advertisements from Rep. Susan Collins, who is a Republican as I’m sure you figured out by now, that mention MoveOn.org. Internet giant Google has…