Get Your Money For Nothing And A New Hoo-ha For Free?
Gee, I wonder why Republicans might have wanted to vet Sandra Fluke before she was permitted to testify as an expert at the original hearing? Now, if she were a conservative, the media would have dug up everything on her by now. Just as with Obama, they aren't interested in vetting the people of the left. They're like the children of the corn, but they eat babies, from what I've heard.
[B]irth control is not all that Ms. Fluke believes private health insurance must cover. She also, apparently, believes that it is discrimination deserving of legal action if “gender reassignment” surgeries are not covered by employer provided health insurance. She makes these views clear in an article she co-edited with Karen Hu in the Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law. The title of the article . . . is “Employment Discrimination Against LGBTQ Persons” and was published in the Journal’s 2011 Annual Review.