Clintons reportedly “furious”as Benghazi bus treads approach Hillary’s back

By
October 12, 2012

O-bubba, this could be good!!

In an exclusive interview with The Daily Caller, Klein said sources close to the Clintons tell him that Bill Clinton has assembled an informal legal team to discuss how the Secretary of State should deal with the issue of being blamed for not preventing the Benghazi terrorist attack last month.

White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters during a press conference Friday that responsibility for the consulate in Libya fell on the State Department, not the White House. Details via  The Daily Caller.

Comments:
  1. Maria says:

    And….isn’t there a book coming out real soon?

  2. Milwaukee says:

    Oh good grief. Mr. “It depends on what “is” means” is worried about honor and integrity? Men of integrity accept responsibility for their mistakes, and the consequences. Scurrilous liars don’t. Bill, Barry is your bosom buddy. Somebody’s got to be the fall guy. Remember, this is taking one for the team.

  3. Don says:

    Please share this note with other friends: As I read more about the Benghazi attack, I am blown away by the unbelievable partisanship of the major networks in protecting Obama from the biggest scandal of his administration. It is 100% clear that the administration knew within 24 hours that it was a terrorist attack and not an out of control mob protesting a video. The possibility that terrorists with links to al-Qaeda were responsible would look bad for Obama since we have been told that al-Qaeda was on the path to defeat. In fact Obama had received reports in August that al-Qaeda was gaining strength in Libya. We have learned that the survivors of the assault were debriefed within 24 hours, and they confirmed that there was no protest beforehand. It was a straightforward military style raid on the compound. On Sept. 12th the McClatchy website posted an article on the attack. http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/09/12/168270/attack-on-us-consulate-in-libya.html The key sentence states,”In Washington, two administration officials, briefing reporters on the condition of anonymity, corroborated much of Bishari’s description of what happened.” The administration officials already knew what had occurred at the consulate because the survivors had been debriefed. They confirmed to the McClatchy reporter that the Libyan was correct, there were no protesters, it was a full scale assault, well planned in advance and timed for September 11th. The Libyan government never accepted the story that this was anything other than a well planned terrorist assault. In fact the day after the attack the one Libyan guard who survived said there were no protesters and it was an sudden assault on the compound. But our President already knew this information. What purpose was served in not telling the country what the President had learned from the survivors? Why spread a lie about a spontaneous protest turning violent?

    The President, Hilary Clinton, and Susan Rice perpetrated a lie, long after the facts were clear. The country deserves an explanation for our President’s actions in intentionally misleading the public and the world. At the United Nations the President had the opportunity to discuss the dangers of a strengthening al-Qaeda. Instead, he blamed the attack on a video. If the Congress had not been controlled by the GOP, this deception may have never come to light. The details of the assault would have been kept a secret. Suddenly just before the Congressional hearings, a State Department official tells reporters that the State Department never accepted the premise that this was a spontaneous event caused by anger over a video. Apparently the State Department listed the event as a terrorist attack within 24 hours, but Clinton was playing the role of a politician and not head of the State Department when she lied to the public.

    President Obama is proud that he gave the order to kill Osama bin Laden, but if al-Qaeda is strengthening and attacking our diplomats, this diminishes the value of his death and it could be argued that we have made him a martyr. We have killed many al-Qaeda leaders in Pakistan but the President of Pakistan says that we are simply creating more radicals with our drone attacks. I cannot know President Obama’s reasons for blaming the consulate attack on a mob and not Islamic terrorists, but it appears to have been a decision based on politics. The President still refuses to admit that he knew the truth within the first day. I think that the country deserves to know why he made the decision to mislead everyone.

    It is obvious that this issue could end Obama’s chances of being re-elected, and the mainstream press may never confront the President. It would only take one question, “Mr. President, when did you learn from the survivors that there were no protesters and that the attack seemed planned and well organized.”

    I have sent a copy of this to ABC, NBC, and CBS but I doubt they will do anything. Please spread the word and send your own copy to the major networks. Don Woods -thanks

    • binky354 says:

      If POTUS didn’t know, there’s another good reason to fire him. However, I believe he knew – but remember he skipped most of his intelligence briefings so he’d have a good excuse not to know.

  4. CWLsun says:

    Reportedly, the final fundraiser event on October 17th for President Obama is to be headed by Pres. Clinton.

    10/9/2012

    http://www.politico.com//blogs/burns-haberman/2012/10/final-nyc-event-for-obama-headed-byclinton-137892.html

  5. [...] Clintons reportedly “furious”as Benghazi bus treads approach Hillary’s back (riehlworldview.com) [...]

  6. [...] Clintons reportedly “furious”as Benghazi bus treads approach Hillary’s back (riehlworldview.com) Share this:DiggEmailShare on TumblrMore Pin ItLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. [...]