Mark Levin has a question for Obama on ‘Binders’

By
October 18, 2012

It’s a valid question, as is the predicate Mark sets for it on Facebook.

So, I have a question: how, exactly, did and does Obama decide who to appoint to over 3,000 non-career positions in his administration, including his senior positions?

Comments:
  1. Ragspierre says:

    Valerie does all that…

    just like she makes most all the other decisions.

  2. glass says:

    For all the ranting by the left on binders, they are clearly blinded by their own ideology and to the hypocrisy of the left.

    Given all the talk by the left regarding binders of women, I don’t expect women to get wage parity if the the president is re-elected. Laws have been on the books since the 1963. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equal_Pay_Act_of_1963.
    Even though the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act was signed into law in January 2009 by the current President as an amendment to the 1964 Civil Rights Act, even our own federal government and the party that signed it have yet to implement it. Here is the left press release that shows it although more can be found on the net.
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/12/women-pay-house-gop_n_1668688.html
    Even Nancy Pelosi from the liberal bastion of SanFrancisco pays her female staffers less.
    http://weaselzippers.us/2012/06/02/war-on-women-pelosi-pays-her-female-staffers-27-less-than-her-male-staff-members/
    The above is utter hypocrisy but my opinion of the govt to do the right thing, regardless of party is rather low. Even the left will not grant hard working women their due. I question why Lilly was needed when a law already existed that could have higher enforcement standards enabled. Also, why isn’t the federal government in compliance to its own laws?
    So sarcastic comments on Amazon office supply pages may be fun and blows off steam, I wonder if that’s really an efficient use of all that ideological energy. Perhaps, instead of bashing someone who’s not in power, a better use would be writing the Senators and Congress critters and ask them why compliance with a 1963 law is just so darn hard, especially when that ideology could have passed anything in the 2008 -2010 legislative period without the interference of all those “women hating” Republicans. So one has to ask the question, if this issue was so important to the left, why didn’t they do anything besides create a piece of paper with pretty words? It’s called pandering.