I Salute Our Dominant Female Overlords, Just Not In The Bedroom, Please!
Quick! Spot the dominant figure in this image!
Look, if some folks enjoy what one might call a more traditional marriage i.e. male dominated – hey, that’s their business, not mine. But to suggest it all has something to do with science, or whatever? Well, maybe, … if you got your science diploma in sixth grade.
Erick is conflating a cultural argument with a biological one. That’s a mistake and a sure fire way to lose both arguments. Megyn Kelly doesn’t look pleased but she sure does look gorgeous. Clue – clearly, motherhood agrees with her, as much as does her high-powered career. I doubt you’ll find her barefoot and pregnant any time soon – except for an exotic vacation of some type, perhaps.
I’d like to think the world and gender roles are just a wee bit more complex than Erick’s comments would suggest.
However, what can I say? We like what we like. I’m just not into the whole dominatrix thang. I’ll take a good female bottom over a top any day of the week. Just sayin’! LOL
But … if we’re compatible and she earns?? Hey, that’s bonus time, baby!!! Hahahaha
Appearing on a Fox Business panel Wednesday evening, Fox contributor Erick Erickson suggested it is “anti-science” to reject the biological claim that men should be in the “dominant” role in the nuclear family.
Posted all in good fun, of course. ; ) More via Fox’s Erick Erickson: It’s ‘Anti-Science’ To Not Believe Men Should ‘Dominate’ Women | Mediaite. Also via Memeorandum.