Beyonce slammed by concerned parents after risque Grammy performance aired at 8pm

By
January 27, 2014

Beyoncé’s Grammy Awards performance was slammed by concerned parents on Sunday as they deemed the incredibly risqué routine too explicit for children to watch.

The 32-year-old singer wore a revealing black thong bodysuit over fishnet tights to perform a rendition of her hit Drunk In Love alongside husband Jay Z at the Staples Center in downtown Los Angeles.

via Grammy Awards | Mail Online.



AdSense 300×250
NewsMax Trending Now
Comments:
  1. Ragspierre says:

    No man who respects his wife/girl friend/date OR himself fondles her in public.

    That kind of behavior is about possession, not love or respect.

  2. Gus says:

    Then don’t let your children watch.

    Right, Clownselor?

    • Ragspierre says:

      Whether my children…all adults BTW…watch or not is not relevant to my comment.

      Is it, moron?

      • Gus says:

        I was directly referring to what the so-called “concerned parents” expressed, dip shit.

        Your comment about your hurt feelings over how another man touches his wife is not relevant to the story posted. Is it, dummy?

        • Ragspierre says:

          Certainly is is, moronic phuc.

          My “feelings” were not “hurt”. But I do live by a code, and being a gentleman is something rather important to me, especially as a father of daughters and someone who respects women.

          • Gus says:

            Yes, a code that qualifies you to make preening judgments about people you don’t know.

            Tell us, Clownselor, should spousal rape be legal? http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/01/16/virginia-legislator-running-for-congress-says-spousal-rape-should-be-legal.html

          • Ragspierre says:

            STILL incapable of reading, or just saying no to being punked by your moonbattery, huh?

            “How on earth you could validly get a conviction of a husband-wife rape when they’re living together, sleeping in the same bed, she’s in a nightie, and so forth, there’s no injury, there’s no separation or anything.”

            Which…if you can read…is remarkably like….

            “When there’s not a third party witness or no external reference it becomes his word against hers,” said RAINN president and founder Scott Berkowitz. “So it’s sometimes very challenging for prosecutors to win a conviction.”

            Gawd, you are soooooo stupid and such a punk.

          • Gus says:

            Ah, so when a woman is married, if she’s wearing a nightie, she can’t be raped as a matter of law. Plus it’s hard to prosecute, therefore, spousal rape should be legal.

            Please keep talking about rape, wingnuts.

          • Ragspierre says:

            No, you lying sack of shit.

            NOBODY…outside of your punk meisters of the moonbattery…said “marital rape should be legal”.

            No. Body.

            What Mr. Black…and his supposed adverary Mr. Berkowitz…said is that it is very hard to prove a charge of “marital rape”, and may not be VALIDLY proven at all.

            You lying sack of shit.

  3. Gus says:

    What was worse, Beyonce and Jay Z doing something you didn’t like, or Queen Latifah performing all those gay marriages? Which act oppressed the Tealiban more?

    • Ragspierre says:

      What a stupid, moronic querry.

      And what a poor, pathetic delusional Collectivist troll. There is no such thing as a “Tealiban”.

      Puke.

      • Gus says:

        So you weren’t personally oppressed by Queen Latifah performing all those gay marriages on tv?

        • Ragspierre says:

          No, hunny. I don’t get “oppressed” by deviant behavior done for the purpose of calling attention to poor, stupid, sick people.

          • Gus says:

            What behavior was “deviant doe for the purpose of calling attention to poor, stupid, sick people”? Specifically, Clownselor.

          • Ragspierre says:

            Pretty much the Grammy Awards.

            Stem to stern.

            You poor, stupid, sick lil’ punk-assed bitch.

  4. Gus says:

    Never fear, Clownselor, there’s a seminar you can take to learn how to talk to women.

    http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=B6CE25EA-F80A-4E02-ABE7-2CFAABA1427E

    • Ragspierre says:

      I have never had any trouble talking to women.

      On the other hand, I don’t have as much in common with them as you do.

  5. Gus says:

    “Pretty much the Grammy Awards.”

    What is it about the Grammy Awards, specifically, in their entirety, that is deviant behavior done for the purpose of calling attention to poor, stupid, sick people”?

    • Ragspierre says:

      If you can’t answer that for yourself, there is nothing I can teach you, moron.

      • Gus says:

        Gotcha. You can’t articulate what behavior is “deviant done for the purposes of calling attention to poor, stupid, sick people.”

        As usual, you are incapable of supporting your “arguments” with even the most cursory of examples.

        • Ragspierre says:

          No, liar. As always, I will not play your stupid game, which is your sole and only “trick”.

          And you are too stupid to…

          1. learn that, and

          2. figure out another trick.

          WHILE exposing your via demonstration.

          Heh!

          • Gus says:

            Yes, “my game” is calling you on your bullshit and you NEVER being able to support your positions.

            You don’t play that “game” because you are incapable.

  6. Ragspierre says:

    “Yes, a code that qualifies you to make preening judgments about people you don’t know.”

    Sure, dick-lips. Observing a person’s behavior DOES qualify a person who has a code to make certain judgments.

    I can tell a shop-lifter is a thief by observation.

    I can tell you are an idiot Collectivist troll by your posts.

    As can everyone else.

    • Gus says:

      I see, so despite the fact that you know nothing of the relationship between two people, you are qualified to judge the character of those people.

      Just because you saw watched them do something rehearsed on tv. Do your powers of insight extend to the actions of actors on tv, in movies, and in plays?

      And yes, I am an admitted troll. Yet you REACT to literally every post I make.

  7. Ragspierre says:

    Who would approve of Baracula fondling Moooochele’s ample butt-ox in public?

    Would we expect Pres. ScamWOW to approve of his daughters allowing photos of any young swain groping them up in public?

    Some here would, of course. They are without any standards.

    • Gus says:

      “Who would approve of [the president] fondling [the first lady’s] [grown, womanly figure] in public?”

      The only people whoes approval is required – theirs.

      “Would we expect [the president] to approve of his daughters allowing photos of any young swain groping them up in public?”

      Your fantasies about groping children aside, you are aware that Beyonce and Jay Z are married adults, right?

      The thought of a successful, black couple displaying their affection in a manner they see fit, simply drives the god-bothers, scolds, and repressed closet-cases crazy. If wingnuts had the sense god gave a dog, they’d hire Beyonce and Jay Z to be spokespersons for traditional marriage.

      Instead of being preening prudes.

      • Ragspierre says:

        We note your obsession with race.

        We note your hatred of religion (which in my case has no application).

        We note your obsession with your own confused sexuality, projected on others.

        We note you have no standards, no honesty, and no brains.

        But plenty of hate-twisted venom.

        As I noted long ago here, the kind of displays by people on the Grammy program do not signal any respect for self, one’s mate/stage mate, or the audience. They do signal the objectification of women, contempt, and selfish indulgence without any apparent taste.

        Thanks for the demonstration.

        • Gus says:

          “We note your [contempt] of religion”

          The only correct observation you’ve made in … ever.

          “As I noted long ago here, the kind of displays by people on the Grammy program do not signal any respect for self, one’s mate/stage mate, or the audience. They do signal the objectification of women, contempt, and selfish indulgence without any apparent taste.”

          According to you, who knows nothing personally of the individuals involved. But that doesn’t stop you from making judgments about their respective relationships.

          But please proceed.

          • Ragspierre says:

            No, liar. I make judgments about people’s behavior.

            Just like all human beings.

            You just lie about it.

  8. Gus says:

    Here’s another thing for you to be upset about, Clownselor:

    http://www.buzzfeed.com/clairepires/heres-everything-we-know-about-the-first-gay-couple-to-ever?bffb

    You must feel very victimized and oppressed this week. And its only Tuesday!

    • Ragspierre says:

      Meh.

      You, though, seem all excited!

      Pitiful little bitch.

      • Gus says:

        It IS exciting to see daily evidence of America rejecting your rancid “values”.

        • Ragspierre says:

          You’re…as always…confused, hunny buns.

          Hollywood is leading a rout of American values, and losing audience every day.

          See, Americans DO have values, even where pukes like you DON’T, and have contempt for those who DO.

          Such as the many Americans…like me…who have tuned out the filth of popular culture you wallow in.

          And, of course, you are wrong as always about what you project on others in your stupid, hate-twisted and demented posts.

          But always good to have you reveal the true nature of the Collective.

          • Gus says:

            “Such as the many Americans…like me…who have tuned out the filth of popular culture you wallow in.”

            Which is why you’ve made – how many – post about Beyonce and Jay Z.

            And, how, specifically, is a same-sex couple on a Disney show, “filth”? Cue the hemming and hawing, and hand waiving.

          • Ragspierre says:

            Still cannot read, huh?

            Still only have lies about what you TRY to read!

            Love IT…!!!

  9. Gus says:

    “No, liar. I make judgments about people’s behavior.”

    Blah blah, you judge the relationships of people you don’t know, based on a musical performance. Looks like they have a naughty, fun time together as husband and wife. You can’t stand seeing that – because you clearly do not.

    • Ragspierre says:

      Right. I do not grope my wife in public, though we are very fond of both PDAs and celebrating our sexuality.

      I respect women.

      You are likely one of those “bois” in San Franciso who parades nude and yanks strange wankers on “Gay Pride Day”.

      “Don’t judge me…!!!”

      • Gus says:

        “Right. I do not grope my wife in public, though we are very fond of both PDAs and celebrating our sexuality.”

        Great. That’s YOU. What qualifies you to judge other people who do it differently than you?

        “You are likely one of those “bois” in San Franciso who parades nude and yanks strange wankers on “Gay Pride Day”.”

        Ah, gotcha. Because you HATE it when other people do it differently than you. One of the many faces of repression.

  10. Gus says:

    “Still cannot read, huh?”

    I read and expose your unsupported generalizations often – like now. I read that you cannot support, with factual evidence, how a same-sex couple appearing on a Disney show, is “filth”.

    • Ragspierre says:

      No, liar. You simply play the game of lying about what was said, and demanding “pwoof” of what your lied about.