Did the EPA Abuse It’s Authority to Influence the 2012 presidential election?

By
July 24, 2014

Perhaps the better question is, is there a government agency Obama hasn’t exploited for political gain? Full pdf of the Landmark Legal release here.

(LEESBURG, VA) — Landmark Legal Foundation today asked Federal District Judge Royce Lamberth to sanction the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for destroying or failing to preserve emails and text messages that may have helped document suspected Agency efforts to influence the 2012 presidential election.

 Mark certainly has a way of turning a phrase. heh

“The EPA is a toxic waste dump for lawlessness and disdain for the Constitution,” said Landmark President Mark Levin. “When any federal agency receives a FOIA request, the statute says it must preserve every significant repository of records, both paper and electronic, that may contain materials that could be responsive to that request. When an agency gets sued it must also notify everyone who might be involved in the suit to preserve everything in their possession that could be discoverable in the litigation. But the people at the EPA, from the Administrator on down, think they’re above the law, that no one has the right to question what or how they do their jobs. Well, they’re wrong. The laws apply to everyone, even federal bureaucrats.”



AdSense 300×250
NewsMax Trending Now
Comments:
  1. Ragspierre says:

    “The laws apply to everyone, even federal bureaucrats.”

    Not in the Obamabanana Republic. That whole “law” thing is out the window.

    • Indeed

      There seems to be NO area of influence they didn’t abuse- what a nightmare, one that seems like it’s never going to end

    • Indeed

      There seems to be NO area of influence they didn’t abuse- what a nightmare, one that seems like it’s never going to end

    • To answer the question: Yes the EPA abused its authority and continues to do so and I doubt the EPA caused Obama to win in 2008. What really doomed Mitt was a hostile biased media and his political campaigning mistakes such as his “48%” comment and not finishing Obama off in debate #2 and #3.

    • To answer the question: Yes the EPA abused its authority and continues to do so and I doubt the EPA caused Obama to win in 2008. What really doomed Mitt was a hostile biased media and his political campaigning mistakes such as his “48%” comment and not finishing Obama off in debate #2.

    • To answer the question: Yes the EPA abused its authority and continues to do so and I doubt the EPA caused Obama to win in 2008. What really doomed Mitt was a hostile biased media and his political campaigning mistakes such as his “48%” comment and not finishing Obama off in debate #2.

  2. Ragspierre says:

    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/383830/top-house-dem-obamas-immigration-orders-are-more-important-vulnerable-dems-joel-gehrke

    See, there is no delusion among racists in the Collective about how clearly they are ruling against the public interest, and that it will cost some of their number elective office.

    Nola importante. The illegal…indeed, TRAITOROUS…plan to legitimize (or at least legalize) millions of low-intensity invaders is too central to the Collectivist long game.

  3. Ragspierre says:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/27/business/the-typical-household-now-worth-a-third-less.html

    Heckuva job, Barry… Of course, HE does not bear all the responsibility for the housing bubble/bank intimidation that led to the Great Rescission. The Collective DOES.

  4. Ragspierre says:

    CIVIL RIGHTS UPDATE: DC Gun Carry Ban Struck Down. “In light of Heller, McDonald, and their progeny, there is no longer any basis on which this Court can conclude that the District of Columbia’s total ban on the public carrying of ready-to-use handguns outside the home is constitutional under any level of scrutiny. Therefore, the Court finds that the District of Columbia’s complete ban on the carrying of handguns in public is unconstitutional. Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and enjoins Defendants from enforcing the home limitations of D.C. Code § 7-2502.02(a)(4) and enforcing D.C. Code § 22-4504(a) unless and until such time as the District of Columbia adopts a licensing mechanism consistent with constitutional standards enabling people to exercise their Second Amendment right to bear arms.4 Furthermore, this injunction prohibits the District from completely banning the carrying of handguns in public for self-defense by otherwise qualified non-residents based solely on the fact that they are not residents of the District.”
    http://alangura.com/2014/07/victory-in-palmer-v-d-c/
    Via InstaPundit

    Whoa.

    Just damn…

  5. Ragspierre says:

    “The Constitution states that it’s Congress’s job to make the laws and the president’s to faithfully execute them. It does not permit a president to suspend a law or grant special dispensations from its requirements. But President Obama has done just these things on numerous occasions, and only the federal courts can preserve the constitutionally mandated separation of powers by definitively rebuffing his illegal actions.”
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/federal-courts-need-to-stop-obama-from-flouting-the-constitution/2014/07/25/138f5bfc-12bc-11e4-98ee-daea85133bc9_story.html

    Yeppers. Well, I think the Congress can do a LOT more, both by way of cutting off fundssssss for various executive agencies AND tightening up the laws so that there is no wiggle room for Pres. ScamWOW to just cheat.

    Some more…

  6. Ragspierre says:

    Richard Fernandez, who occupies the OTHER end of the “smart and aware of reality” bell-curve from Kerry and Baracula.

    http://pjmedia.com/richardfernandez/2014/07/26/christmas-in-july/#more-38293

    Every day brings the world closer to a conflagration, and it is mostly on our administration.

    Magical thinking is dangerous.

  7. Ragspierre says:

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-you-don-t-get-pick-which-rules-you-play_797428.html

    While demagoging the issue of “inversions”, Pres. ScamWOW actually said, “You don’t get to pick which rules you play by, or which tax rate you pay, and neither should these companies.”

    Captain Self-Awareness he ain’t.

  8. Proof says:

    Proof once again that Mark Levin is more than just a pretty face! Heh.

  9. Ragspierre says:

    http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/383981/sessions-congress-block-obamas-executive-orders-amnesty-or-face-cantors-fate-andrew

    Jeff Sessions warns Congress not to leave the door open during their recess.

    Slam it against Pres. ScamWOW.

  10. Ragspierre says:

    http://washingtonexaminer.com/why-doesnt-the-left-care-about-shaneen-allen/article/2551368

    It’s high time the Congress stepped in and homogenized this civil rights issue.

    People who TRY hard to abide by the law should not be ground to powder like this poor woman.